Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):296-321 (2009)

Abstract
The United Nations Scientific, Education and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) expresses in its title and substance a controversial linkage of two normative systems: international human rights law and bioethics. The UDBHR has the status of what is known as a ‘non-binding’ declaration under public international law. The UDBHR’s normative foundation within bioethics (and association, for example, with virtue-based or principlist bioethical theories) is more problematic. Nonetheless, the UDBHR contains socially important principles of technology transfer and transnational benefit (articles 14, 15 and 21). This paper is one of the first to explore how the disciplines of bioethics and international human rights law may interact in the UDBHR to advance the policy relevance and health impact of technology transfer and transnational benefit principles. It investigates their normative ancestry in the UDBHR, as well as relevant conceptual differences between bioethics and public international law in this respect and how these may be relevant to their conceptual evolution and application.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhp021
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,179
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Virtue Ethics: A Misleading Category? [REVIEW]Martha C. Nussbaum - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (3):163-201.
Toward a Virtue-Based Normative Ethics for the Health Professions.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (3):253-277.
Principlism and Its Alleged Competitors.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (3):181-198.
Taking the '''Ism''' Out of Cosmopolitanism An Essay in Reconstruction.Robert Fine - 2003 - European Journal of Social Theory 6 (4):451--470.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: A Canon for the Ages?G. Trotter - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):195-203.
Medicine, Morality, and Mortality: The Challenges of Moral Diversity.Mark J. Cherry - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (5):473-483.
In Defence of Helsinki and Human Rights.A. Plomer - 2012 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 5 (2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

UNESCO’s Activities in Ethics.Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):7-15.
Defending the Indefensible.Udo Schuklenk - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):83-88.
The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights.Nermin Gedik - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.
The Activities of UNESCO in the Area of Ethics.H. ten Have - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):333-351.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-05-17

Total views
35 ( #258,951 of 2,285,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #199,094 of 2,285,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature