Three proposals for rewarding novel health technologies benefiting people living in poverty. A comparative analysis of prize funds, health impact funds and a cost-effectiveness/competitive tender treaty
Public Health Ethics 1 (2):146-153 (2008)
Abstract
Thomas Alured Faunce, College of Law, Fellows Road, Acton, Canberra ACT 0200, Australian National University, Fax: 61 2 61253971, Email: Thomas.Faunce{at}anu.edu.au ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//-->This paper sets out to analyse three different academic proposals for addressing the needs of the poor in relation to new, rather than ‘essential’ medicines. It focuses particularly on research and development prize funds, a health impact fund system and a multilateral treaty on health technology cost-effectiveness evaluation and competitive tender. It compares the extent to which each responds to the ‘market fundamentalist’ philosophy and begins to analyse their respective strengths and weaknesses. CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?DOI
10.1093/phe/phn013
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- europepmc.org
(no proxy) - phe.oxfordjournals.org (no proxy)
- phe.oxfordjournals.org [2] (no proxy)
- phe.oxfordjournals.org [3] (no proxy)
- phe.oxfordjournals.org [4] (no proxy)
- phe.oxfordjournals.org [5] (no proxy)
- academic.oup.com (no proxy)
- ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Implementing the marmot commission's recommendations: Social justice requires a solution to the equity–efficiency trade-off.Ole Frithjof Norheim - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
Justice and competitive markets.Baruch A. Brody - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):37-50.
Global health impact: A basis for labeling and licensing campaigns?Nicole Hassoun - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):121-134.
Consensus and health policy in hungary.Tamas Angelus - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):455-462.
Impartiality and disability discrimination.Greg Bognar - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (1):1-23.
Universal health care coverage – pitfalls and promise of an employment-based approach.Peter Budetti - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):21-32.
A moderate pluralist approach to public health policy and ethics.Michael J. Selgelid - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (2):195-205.
Does Cost Effectiveness Analysis Unfairly Discriminate against People with Disabilities?Greg Bognar - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):394-408.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-12-21
Downloads
39 (#301,610)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2009-12-21
Downloads
39 (#301,610)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The health impact fund: A useful supplement to the patent system?Aidan Hollis - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):124-133.
Incentivizing access and innovation for essential medicines: A survey of the problem and proposed solutions.Michael Ravvin - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):110-123.
Patent Ethics: The Misalignment of Views Between the Patent System and the Wider Society.Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Anders Braarud Hanssen, Hanne Marie Nielsen & Ingrid Olesen - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1551-1576.
References found in this work
World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):455-458.
Human rights and global health: A research program.Thomas W. Pogge - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (1‐2):182-209.
The health impact fund: A useful supplement to the patent system?Aidan Hollis - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):124-133.
Incentivizing access and innovation for essential medicines: A survey of the problem and proposed solutions.Michael Ravvin - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):110-123.
