Modern cosmology treats space and time, or rather space-time, as concrete particulars. The General Theory of Relativity combines the distribution of matter and energy with the curvature of space-time. Here space-time appears as a concrete entity which affects matter and energy and is affected by the things in it. I question the idea that space-time is a concrete existing entity which both substantivalism and reductive relationism maintain. Instead I propose an alternative view, which may be called non-reductive relationism, by arguing that space and time are abstract entities based on extension and changes.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is Space-Time Discrete or Continuous? — An Empirical Question.Peter Forrest - 1995 - Synthese 103 (3):327--354.
What Can We Learn About the Ontology of Space and Time From the Theory of Relativity?John D. Norton - manuscript
Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads210 ( #17,406 of 2,143,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,613 of 2,143,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.