Abstract
In most discussions of the social justice implications of new genetic technologies, enhancements are considered to be highly contentious. This is particularly so when we speak of enhancements that benefit the recipient in positional terms and enhancements that are germ-line and which can be passed on to future generations. I argue that the egalitarian reluctance, as displayed by Max Mehlman, to permitting enhancements is overblown. Recent writings from Buchanan and Farrelly highlight a more positive, context-dependent, role for permitting the socio-economically advantaged the freedom to gain access to enhancements, including enhancements of traits associated with positional or competitive advantage. I argue that this reasoning also applies to germ-line enhancements or, at least, to 'effective germ-line enhancements.' In other words, I argue that such enhancements should be more seriously considered in terms of this positive context-dependent role. Nevertheless, this support is not unqualified. I critically re-examine concerns regarding the notion of the genetic underclass and I raise some worries about the possible adverse consequence of such a regulatory framework on sustaining the required egalitarian ethos. Importantly, such worries will be focused on the adverse effects of inequalities, rather than germ-line enhancements themselves.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2202/1941-6008.1122
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,909
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Germ-Line Enhancements and Rough Equality.Michele Loi - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):55-82.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancements and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):217-230.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancements and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):217-230.
Genetic Enhancements and Expectations.K. Sorensen - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):433-435.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancement and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 18 (1):10-26.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancement and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):39-56.
One Danger of Biomedical Enhancements.Alex Rajczi - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (6):328–336.
Some Jewish Thoughts on Genetic Enhancement.S. M. Glick - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):415-419.
Justice in the Genetically Transformed Society.Colin Patrick Farrelly - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):91-99.
Incentives, Genetics and the Egalitarian Ethos.Oliver Feeney - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):83-102.
The Modern Olympics & Post-Modern Athletics.Randall Mayes - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 10:1-17.
Enhancement and the Ethics of Development.Allen Buchanan - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (1):pp. 1-34.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
38 ( #265,183 of 2,402,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes