Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):45 – 70 (1996)
The debate between Marcuse and Habermas over technology marked a significant turning point in the history of the Frankfurt School. After the 1960s Habermas's influence grew as Marcuse's declined and Critical Theory adopted a far less Utopian stance. Recently there has been a revival of quite radical technology criticism in the environmental movement and under the influence of Foucault and constructivism. This article takes a new look at the earlier debate from the standpoint of these recent developments. While much of Habermas's argument remains persuasive, his defense of modernity now seems to concede far too much to the claims of autonomous technology. His essentialist picture of technology as an application of a purely instrumental form of nonsocial rationality is less plausible after a decade of historicizing research in technology studies. The article argues that Marcuse was right after all to claim that technology is socially determined even if he was unable to develop his insight fruitfully. The article derives a new approach to technology criticism from both constructivism and Habermas's communication theory. The essence of technology is shown to be historical and reflexive, like the essence of other social institutions. As such an institution, its rationality is always implemented in value?biased forms subject to political critique
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Multiculturalism.Kwame Anthony Appiah, Charles Taylor, Jürgen Habermas, Stephen C. Rockefeller, Michael Walzer & Susan Wolf - 1994 - Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
From Human-Centred to Human-Context Centred Approach: Looking Back Over 'the Hills', What has Been Gained and Lost? [REVIEW]Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (4):471-495.
Possibilities of Democratisation in Organisations.Han van Diest - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (1):97 – 117.
Similar books and articles
Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited.Andrew Feenberg - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Feenberg and STS: Counter-Reflections on Bridging the Gap. [REVIEW]Jeff Kochan - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (4):702-720.
Socially Constructed Technology.David J. Stump - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):217 – 224.
Interview with Andrew Feenberg.Laureano Ralon - 2010 - Figure/Ground Communication's Scholarly Interview Series.
Heidegger and Marcuse : The Catastrophe and Redemption of Technology.Andrew Feenberg - 2004 - In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge.
Habermas, Marcuse and the Aufhebung of Science and Technology.Norman Stockman - 1978 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (1):15-35.
Radical Philosophy of Technology.Andrew Feenberg - 2009 - Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):199-217.
Marcuse, Habermas, and the Critique of Technology.Samir Gandesha - 2004 - In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge.
From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg.Iain Thomson - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):203 – 215.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads91 ( #56,836 of 2,170,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?