Andrew Feenberg
Simon Fraser University
In this reply I address problems identified by my critics in my concept of formal bias, my use of phenomenology, the relation between my work and McLuhan’s media theory, and the relation of science to technology
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Philosophy of Science  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1091-8264
DOI 10.5840/techne20131719
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critical Theory of Technology.Andrew Feenberg - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Formal Bias and Normative Critique of Technology Design.Graeme Kirkpatrick - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):25-46.
The Role of Experience in the Critical Theory of Technology.Roy Bendor - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):47-71.
Interview with Andrew Feenberg.Laureano Ralon - 2010 - Figure/Ground Interview Series.
Critical Philosophy of Technology: The Basic Issues.Hans Radder - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (1):51 – 70.
Andrew Feenberg, Critical Theory of Technology.A. J. Cohen - 1994 - Theory and Society 23:575-575.


Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #193,105 of 2,506,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes