Miracles and Science: Mora than a Miraculous Relationship

Toronto Journal of Theology 28 (1):159-163 (2012)

Yiftach J. H. Fehige
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
A solicited response to Robert Larmer's defence of the supernaturalist model of miracles. I show why Larmer fails to make his claim plausible that there aren't any good theological reasons to turn away from the supernaturalist model of miracles.
Keywords Miracles  Supernaturalism  Christianity and Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,481
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Against Miracles.John Collier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):349-.
Miracles: Nowell-Smith’s Analysis and Tillich’s Phenomenology.John King-Farlow - 1962 - International Philosophical Quarterly 2 (2):265-294.
Miracles.Paul Fitzgerald - 1985 - Philosophical Forum 17 (1):48 - 64.
C. S. Peirce on Miracles.Robert H. Ayers - 1980 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 16 (3):242 - 254.
Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument Against Miracles.Peter Harrison - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.
Miracles, Evidence, and God.Robert Larmer - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (1):107-.
Proofs of Miracles and Miracles as Proofs.Richard L. Purtill - 1976 - Christian Scholar’s Review 6.


Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #512,198 of 2,446,240 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,899 of 2,446,240 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes