Public Affairs Quarterly 18 (4):273-298 (2004)

Authors
Neil Feit
Fredonia State University
Abstract
In the past decade, three philosophers in particular have recently explored the relation between desert and intrinsic value. Fred Feldman argues that consequentialism need not give much weight – or indeed any weight at all – to the happiness of persons who undeservedly experience pleasure. He defends the claim that the intrinsic value of a state of affairs is determined by the “fit” between the amount of well-being that a person receives and the amount of well-being that the person deserves. Shelly Kagan uses a similar claim to motivate the view that equality is not intrinsically valuable. Thomas Hurka argues that desert is a third-order value, which is a function of the relation between the second-order value of having a virtuous or vicious character and the first-order value of experiencing pleasure or pain. In this paper, we sketch a theory of desert as fittingness and defend a general account of the relation between desert, well-being, and intrinsic value. We then discuss various applications of our “geometry of desert,” including a solution to the problem of the Repugnant Conclusion. In so doing, we explain, revise, and extend many of these authors’ central ideas.
Keywords Desert  Geometry  Fred Feldman  Thomas Hurka  Shelly Kagan  Consequentialism  Intrinsic Value
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Comparative Harm, Creation and Death.Neil Feit - 2016 - Utilitas 28 (2):136-163.
Desert.Owen McLeod - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Forfeiture Theory and Symmetrical Attackers.Stephen Kershnar - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (2):224-245.
A Complex Experiential Account of Pleasure.Stephen Kershnar - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (2):153-165.
The Time of Intrinsic Value.Stephen Kershnar - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (3):317-329.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Geometry of Desert.Shelly Kagan - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Desert Tracks Character Alone.Stephen Kershnar - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):71-88.
The Desert.Stanislas Breton - 2004 - Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):315-320.
Remarks on the Geometry of Visibles.Gordon Belot - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):581–586.
Just Deserts and Needs.Gillian Brock - 1999 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):165-188.
Giving Capitalists Their Due.Stephen Kershnar - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):65-87.
Ternary Operations as Primitive Notions for Plane Geometry II.Victor Pambuccian - 1992 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 38 (1):345-348.
The Trilemma of Desert.Stephen Kershnar - 2006 - Public Affairs Quarterly 20 (3):219-233.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-17

Total views
24 ( #453,888 of 2,448,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #302,300 of 2,448,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes