Hidden Variables and Incompatible Observables in Quantum Mechanics

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):905-927 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article takes up a suggestion that the reason we cannot find certain hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, as in Bell’s theorem, is that we require them to assign joint probability distributions on incompatible observables. These joint distributions are problematic because they are empirically meaningless on one standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. Some have proposed getting around this problem by using generalized probability spaces. I present a theorem to show a sense in which generalized probability spaces can’t serve as hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, so the proposal for getting around Bell’s theorem fails. 1 Introduction2 Bell’s Theorem and Classical Probability Spaces2.1 Bell’s derivation of the Bell inequalities2.2 Pitowsky’s derivation of the Bell inequalities3 Incompatible Observables4 Generalized Probability Spaces5 A ‘No-Go’ Theorem6 Conclusions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reality, locality, and probability.Stanley P. Gudder - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (10):997-1010.
Interpretation of the quantum formalism and Bell's theorem.Emilio Santos - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (2):221-241.
Hidden variables and locality.Jeffrey Bub - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (5):511-525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-03

Downloads
81 (#202,650)

6 months
22 (#118,559)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin Feintzeig
University of Washington