Logical analysis of the psychophysical problem

Philosophy of Science 1 (4):420-45 (1934)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The mind-body problem is—despite appearances—still the inevitable basic issue of unending discussions in recent philosophy. Various types of epistemologies and metaphysics, European and American, have offered their widely divergent “solutions” of the dreaded Cartesian tangle. Is there any hope of reaching a universally acceptable view?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
237 (#77,252)

6 months
5 (#244,526)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The American Reception of Logical Positivism: First Encounters, 1929–1932.Sander Verhaegh - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (10):106-142.
Philosophy of Psychology and Psychiatry.Jonathan Y. Tsou - forthcoming - In Flavia Padovani & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), Handbook of the History of Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
The mind-body problem in the origin of logical empiricism: Herbert Feigl and psychophysical parallelism.Michael Heidelberger - 2001 - In Paolo Parrini, Wes Salmon & Merrilee Salmon (eds.), Cogprints. Pittsburgh University Pres. pp. 233--262.
S. S. Stevens and the origins of operationism.Gary L. Hardcastle - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (3):404-424.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references