Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):145 (1986)

Authors
Abstract
I shall be concerned in this paper with some philosophical puzzles raised by so-called “wrongful life” suits. These legal actions are obviously of great interest to lawyers and physicians, but philosophers might have a kind of professional interest in them too, since in a remarkably large number of them, judges have complained that the issues are too abstruse for the courts and belong more properly to philosophers and theologians. The issues that elicit this judicial frustration are those that require the application to border-line cases of such philosophically interesting concepts as acting, causing, and the one that especially interests me, harming. I first became interested in the concept of harming in my work on the moral limits of the criminal law, where I had to come to terms with John Stuart Mill's famous “harm principle”–the principle that it is always a good reason in support of a criminal prohibition, indeed, the only legitimate reason, that it will prevent harm to persons other than the actor. I could not very well criticize that principle until I decided what the word “harm” must mean in its formulation. I gave what I took to be the requisite analysis of harm in my book Harm to Others. Here I wish to improve that analysis, examine its implications for civil as well as criminal liability, and test it on conceptually hard cases, especially cases of prenatal harming, that is, cases in which the wrongful causative conduct occurs before the victim's birth, and the harmed state that is its upshot consists in being born in an impaired condition
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0265052500000467
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Harm to Others.Stephen L. Darwall - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (4):691-694.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Harming as Making Worse Off.Duncan Purves - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (10):2629-2656.
Harming as Causing Harm.Elizabeth Harman - 2009 - In M. A. Roberts & D. T. Wasserman (eds.), Harming Future Persons. Springer Verlag. pp. 137--154.
Intergenerational Justice.Lukas Meyer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Harm and Its Moral Significance.Seana Valentine Shiffrin - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (3):357-398.
Imposing Genetic Diversity.Robert Sparrow - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (6):2-10.

View all 62 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wrongful Life, Wrongful Disability, and the Argument Against Cloning.David K. Chan - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):257-272.
The Ascription of Rights in Wrongful Life Suits.Nancy S. Jecker - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):149-165.
What is Wrong with 'Wrongful Life' Cases?Barry M. Loewer - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):127-146.
Wrongful Life and Abortion.Jeremy Williams - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (4):351-366.
When Is Birth Unfair to the Child?Bonnie Steinbock & Ron McClamrock - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (6):15-21.
Wrongful Life, Suicide, and Euthanasia.Jakob Elster - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):273-282.
A Critique of a 'Wrongful Life' Lawsuit in Korea.Y.-R. Um - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (3):250-261.
Wrongful Life: Some of the Problems.A. N. Liu - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (2):69-73.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-31

Total views
376 ( #26,367 of 2,498,529 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #80,494 of 2,498,529 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes