Brueckner and Fischer on the evil of death

Philosophical Studies 162 (2):309-317 (2013)
Abstract
Abstract   According to the Deprivation Approach, the evil of death is to be explained by the fact that death deprives us of the goods we would have enjoyed if we had lived longer. But the Deprivation Approach confronts a problem first discussed by Lucretius. Late birth seems to deprive us of the goods we would have enjoyed if we had been born earlier. Yet no one is troubled by late birth. So it’s hard to see why we should be troubled by its temporal mirror image, early death. In a 1986 paper, Anthony Brueckner and John Martin Fischer appealed to a version of Derek Parfit’s “Bias toward the Future”; they claimed that early death deprives us of future goods that we care about, while late birth deprives us of past goods that we don’t care about. In this paper I show that the Brueckner–Fischer principle is open to several possible interpretations, but that it does not solve the Lucretius problem no matter how we understand it. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-9 DOI 10.1007/s11098-011-9766-6 Authors Fred Feldman, Department of Philosophy, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA Journal Philosophical Studies Online ISSN 1573-0883 Print ISSN 0031-8116
Keywords Death  Deprivation Approach  Lucretius  The mirror of time  Symmetry problem  Brueckner and Fischer  Parfit  Bias toward the future  Asymmetry
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-011-9766-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,195
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
On the Nature of Things. Lucretius - 2001 - Hackett Publishing Company.
Death.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Noûs 4 (1):73-80.
Some Puzzles About the Evil of Death.Fred Feldman - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (2):205-227.
Why is Death Bad?Anthony L. Brueckner & John Martin Fischer - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (2):213-221.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Past and Future Non-Existence.Jens Johansson - 2013 - Journal of Ethics 17 (1-2):51-64.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Past and Future Non-Existence.Jens Johansson - 2013 - Journal of Ethics 17 (1-2):51-64.
Brueckner and Fischer on the Evil of Death.Huiyuhl Yi - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):295-303.
Fischer on Death and Unexperienced Evils. [REVIEW]Ben Bradley - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):507-513.
Replies to Critics. [REVIEW]John Fischer - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):529-540.
How Bad is Death?Ben Bradley - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):111-127.
Why is Death Bad?Anthony L. Brueckner & John Martin Fischer - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (2):213-221.
On Fischer's Our Stories. [REVIEW]Derk Pereboom - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):523-528.
Death.James W. Evra - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-06-27

Total downloads

123 ( #39,088 of 2,163,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #33,422 of 2,163,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums