Epistemological puzzles about disagreement

In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press. pp. 216-236 (2006)
Authors
Richard Feldman
University of Rochester
Abstract
My conclusion will be that, more often than we might have thought, suspension of judgment is the epistemically proper attitude. It follows that in such cases we lack reasonable belief and so, at least on standard conceptions, knowledge. This is a kind of contingent real-world skepticism that has not received the attention it deserves. I hope that this paper will help to bring this issue to life.
Keywords agnosticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,812
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Higher-Order Evidence.David Christensen - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):185-215.
You Just Believe That Because….Roger White - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):573-615.
Moral Intuitionism and Disagreement.Brian Besong - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2767-2789.

View all 85 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy and Disagreement.Brian Ribeiro - 2011 - Critica 43 (127):3-25.
The Reflective Epistemic Renegade.Bryan Frances - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2):419 - 463.
Who is an Epistemic Peer?Axel Gelfert - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (4):507-514.
Disagreement.Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Understanding Kripke's Puzzles About Belief.Michael McGlone - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):487-514.
Possible Disagreements and Defeat.Brandon Carey - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (3):371-381.
Defending a Sensitive Neo-Moorean Invariantism.Tim Black - 2008 - In Vincent Hendricks & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 8--27.
Disagreement.Graham Oppy - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):183-199.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-06-16

Total downloads
850 ( #2,092 of 2,293,655 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #15,687 of 2,293,655 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature