Human research ethics committees members: ethical review personal perceptions [Book Review]

Monash Bioethics Review 39 (1):94-114 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study aims to characterise Human Research Ethics Committee members’ perceptions on five main themes associated with ethics reviews, namely, the nature of research, ethical/moral issues, assent, participants’ risk and HREC prerogatives issues. Three hundred and sixteen HREC members from over 200 HRECs throughout Australia responded to an online questionnaire survey. The results show that in general, HREC members’ beliefs are reasoned and align with sound principles of ethical reviews. There seems to be a disposition for living up to ethical/moral values, avoiding the issue of consent waivers and respecting participants’ welfare, as well as a sense of ambiguity about HREC prerogatives. Problematic areas were a tendency towards over-valuing quantitative research methods for their perceived validity and a neutral view on issuing consent waivers to participants with intellectual disability and, finally, the belief that research that limits disclosure, plans deception or actively conceals is morally unjustifiable. Implications for professional development and policy-making are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Attitudes to Research Ethical Committees.P. Allen & W. E. Waters - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):61-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-30

Downloads
5 (#1,161,049)

6 months
2 (#276,905)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Chris Campbell
University College London
Kevin F. Watson
University of Kansas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations