Marc Fellman, Anne-Marie Irwin, Keagan Brewer, Marguerite Maher, Kevin Watson, Chris Campbell & Boris Handal
Monash Bioethics Review 39 (1):94-114 (2021)
AbstractThis study aims to characterise Human Research Ethics Committee members’ perceptions on five main themes associated with ethics reviews, namely, the nature of research, ethical/moral issues, assent, participants’ risk and HREC prerogatives issues. Three hundred and sixteen HREC members from over 200 HRECs throughout Australia responded to an online questionnaire survey. The results show that in general, HREC members’ beliefs are reasoned and align with sound principles of ethical reviews. There seems to be a disposition for living up to ethical/moral values, avoiding the issue of consent waivers and respecting participants’ welfare, as well as a sense of ambiguity about HREC prerogatives. Problematic areas were a tendency towards over-valuing quantitative research methods for their perceived validity and a neutral view on issuing consent waivers to participants with intellectual disability and, finally, the belief that research that limits disclosure, plans deception or actively conceals is morally unjustifiable. Implications for professional development and policy-making are discussed.
Similar books and articles
HREC Members' Personal Values Influence Decision Making in Contentious Cases.Boris Handal, Kevin Watson, Keagan Brewer, Marc Fellman, Marguerite Maher & Hannah Ianiello - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (3):405-439.
REC Members' Perceptions of Their Training Needs: Report of an AREC Audit.Paula McGee, Gordon Taylor, Roger Rawbone, Carol Dawson, Kate McGarva & Richard Nicholson - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):119-131.
Research on Human Subjects: Australian Ethics Committees Take Tentative Steps.L. W. Osborne - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):66-68.
Science Review in Research Ethics Committees: Double Jeopardy?Stephen Humphreys, Hilary Thomas & Robyn Martin - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (4):227-237.
Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
Tis but a Scratch: The Human Tissue Act and the Use of Tissue for Research, Issues for Research Ethics Committees.David Hunter - unknown
Is It Time to Abandon Institutional Research Ethics Committees?J. Savulescu - 2002 - Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S74-S77.
Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Research Ethics Committees.C. A. Schuppli & D. Fraser - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):294-301.
Different Views on Ethics: How Animal Ethics is Situated in a Committee Culture.M. Ideland - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):258-261.
Lay Members of New Zealand Research Ethics Committees: Who and What Do They Represent?Helen Gremillion, Martin Tolich & Ralph Bathurst - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (2):82-97.
Attitudes to Research Ethical Committees.P. Allen & W. E. Waters - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):61-65.
Research Ethics Committees: The Role of Ethics in a Regulatory Authority.S. McGuinness - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):695-700.
Transforming a Personal Inquiry Into a Research Project: Case Study.E. L. Pattullo - 1981 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 3 (4):5-6.
Twenty Years of Human Research Ethics Committees in the Baltic States.Vilius Dranseika, Eugenijus Gefenas, Asta Cekanauskaite, H. U. G. Kristina, Signe Mezinska, Eimantas Peicius, Vents Silis, Andres Soosaar & Martin Strosberg - 2011 - Developing World Bioethics 11 (1):48-54.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Paying People to Participate in Research: Why Not?Paul McNeill - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (5):390-396.
What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand They Are Participants in Research?David Wendler & Christine Grady - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (4):203–208.
When is Deception in Research Ethical?Nafsika Athanassoulis & James Wilson - 2009 - Clinical Ethics 4 (1):44-49.
Non-Therapeutic Research with Minors: How Do Chairpersons of German Research Ethics Committees Decide?C. Lenk - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):85-87.