The allure of science has always captivated members of the legal profession. Its siren's song has followed us throughout much of American legal history. We look to science to rescue us from the experience of uncertainty and the discomfort of difficult legal decisions, and we are constantly disappointed.The notion of what constitutes science and what it would take to make law more scientific varies across time. What does not vary is our constant return to the well. We are constantly seduced into believing that some new science will provide answers to law's dilemmas, and we are constantly disappointed.This essay describes episodes in law's misguided love affair with science across the last two hundred years. Illuminating the tantalizing traps that we fall into repeatedly may help us avoid these paths in the future.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Readings in Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy.Morris Raphael Cohen - 1951 - New York: Prentice-Hall.
For the Love of God and People: A Philosophy of Jewish Law.Elliot N. Dorff - 2007 - The Jewish Publication Society.
The Place of the Explanation of Particular Facts in Science.William P. Alston - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (1):13-34.
The Suspension of Suspension: Settling for the Improbable.Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos - unknown
The Gift of Science: Leibniz and the Modern Legal Tradition.Roger Stuart Berkowitz - 2005 - Harvard University Press.
Irreconcilable Differences? The Troubled Marriage of Science and Law.Susan Haack - 2009 - Law and Contemporary Problems 72 (1).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #687,900 of 2,154,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #397,226 of 2,154,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?