Number words and reference to numbers

Philosophical Studies 168 (1):261-282 (2014)
A realist view of numbers often rests on the following thesis: statements like ‘The number of moons of Jupiter is four’ are identity statements in which the copula is flanked by singular terms whose semantic function consists in referring to a number (henceforth: Identity). On the basis of Identity the realists argue that the assertive use of such statements commits us to numbers. Recently, some anti-realists have disputed this argument. According to them, Identity is false, and, thus, we may deny that the relevant statements commit us to numbers. The present paper argues that the correct linguistic analysis of the relevant number statements supports the anti-realist view that Identity is false. However, as will further be shown, pace the anti-realist, this analysis does not establish that such statements do not commit us to numbers after all
Keywords Ontological commitment  Abstract objects  Number words  Frege  Specificational sentences  Nominalizations
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-013-0129-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,807
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.Jon Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Go Figure: A Path Through Fictionalism.Stephen Yablo - 2001 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25 (1):72–102.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What ‘the Number of Planets is Eight’ Means.Robert Knowles - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2757-2775.
Number Sentences and Specificational Sentences.Robert Schwartzkopff - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2173-2192.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Number Determiners, Numbers, and Arithmetic.Thomas Hofweber - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (2):179-225.
Reference to Numbers in Natural Language.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):499 - 536.
Number Words and Ontological Commitment.Berit Brogaard - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):1–20.
The Number of Planets, a Number-Referring Term?Friederike Moltmann - 2016 - In Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Abstractionism: Essays in Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press. pp. 113-129.
What Are Numbers?Zvonimir Šikić - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):159-171.
Identity, Individuality, and Unity.E. J. Lowe - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (3):321-336.
Frege Meets Dedekind: A Neologicist Treatment of Real Analysis.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):335--364.
On Infinite Number and Distance.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):126-130.
Alethic Statements Are Not Intensional.Ari Maunu - 2006 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):53-61.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
77 ( #75,100 of 2,214,646 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #87,797 of 2,214,646 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature