Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3):469-479 (2015)
AbstractStrategies for improving individual decision making have attracted attention from a range of disciplines. Surprisingly, neuroscience has been largely absent from this conversation, despite the fact that it has recently begun illuminating the neural bases of how and why we make decisions, and is poised for further such advances. Here we address empirical and normative questions about “nudging” through the lens of neuroscience. We suggest that the neuroscience of decision making can provide a framework for understanding how nudges work, and how they can be improved. Towards this end, we first examine how nudges can be incorporated into a leading model of decision making supported by neurobiological data, and use the model to make predictions about the relative effectiveness of different classes of nudges. We then use the model to demonstrate how nudges can both infringe upon and promote autonomy. Finally, we explore the normative implications of the converging consensus from neuroscience and related fields that many everyday decisions are susceptible to covert external influences
Similar books and articles
The Institutional Consequences of Nudging – Nudges, Politics, and the Law.Robert Lepenies & Magdalena Małecka - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3):427-437.
Doing Good by Stealth: Comments on 'Salvaging the Concept of Nudge'.Richard E. Ashcroft - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):494-494.
Neuroscience of Decision Making and Informed Consent: An Investigation in Neuroethics.G. Northoff - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):70-73.
Nudging in Interpersonal Contexts.Yashar Saghai - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):33-34.
Nudging as a Threat to Privacy.Andreas Kapsner & Barbara Sandfuchs - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3):455-468.
Cognitive Neuroscience and Moral Decision-Making: Guide or Set Aside?Derek Leben - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (2):163-174.
Emotion and Reason: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Decision Making.Giselle Weiss (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Memory, Attention, and Decision-Making: A Unifying Computational Neuroscience Approach.Edmund T. Rolls - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
What Can Neuroscience Contribute to Ethics?T. Buller - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):63-64.
Further Steps Toward a Second-Person Neuroscience.Nehdia Sameen, Joseph Thompson & Jeremy Im Carpendale - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):437-437.
Public Views on Policies Involving Nudges.William Hagman, David Andersson, Daniel Västfjäll & Gustav Tinghög - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3):439-453.
Nudges and Cultural Variance: A Note on Selinger and Whyte.Luc Bovens - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):483-486.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
From Libertarian Paternalism to Nudging—and Beyond.Adrien Barton & Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3):341-359.
Why Behavioural Policy Needs Mechanistic Evidence.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2016 - Economics and Philosophy 32 (3):463-483.
Updating Our Selves: Synthesizing Philosophical and Neurobiological Perspectives on Incorporating New Information Into Our Worldview.Fay Niker, Peter B. Reiner & Gidon Felsen - 2015 - Neuroethics 11 (3):273-282.
Pre-Authorization: A Novel Decision-Making Heuristic That May Promote Autonomy.Fay Niker, Peter B. Reiner & Gidon Felsen - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (5):27-29.
Nudge Versus Boost: A Distinction Without a Normative Difference.Andrew Sims & Thomas Michael Müller - 2019 - Economics and Philosophy 35 (2):195-222.
References found in this work
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience.Selim Berker - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):293-329.