Theoria 74 (3):219-238 (2008)
The most popular concepts of happiness among psychologists and philosophers nowadays are concepts of happiness according to which happiness is defined as " satisfaction with life as a whole ". Such concepts are " Whole Life Satisfaction " concepts of happiness. I show that there are hundreds of non-equivalent ways in which a WLS conception of happiness can be developed. However, every precise conception either requires actual satisfaction with life as a whole or requires hypothetical satisfaction with life as a whole. I show that a person can be "happy" at a time even though he is not actually satisfied with his life as a whole at that time. I also show that a person can be "happy" at a time even though it is not correct to say that if he were to think about his life at that time, he would be satisfied with it as a whole. My thesis is that if you think that happiness is the Good, you should avoid defining happiness as whole life satisfaction.
|Keywords||welfare eudaimonism Richard Brandt Wayne Sumner prudential value happiness Wladyslaw Tatarkiewicz whole life satisfaction well‐being Elizabeth Telfer|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Quality of Life Assessments, Cognitive Reliability, and Procreative Responsibility.Jason Marsh - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2):436-466.
Sisyphus, Happiness and Transcendence.Anné H. Verhoef - 2014 - South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):537-546.
Similar books and articles
Happiness and Subjective Desire Satisfaction: Wayne Davis's Theory of Happiness.Fred Feldman - manuscript
Happiness, Contentment and the Good Life.Thomas L. Carson - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (4):378.
On Being Happy or Unhappy.Daniel M. Haybron - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):287–317.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads228 ( #15,936 of 2,158,842 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #34,877 of 2,158,842 )
How can I increase my downloads?