What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices

Cognition 123 (3):434-441 (2012)
Authors
David Evans
Utah State University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords info:mesh/Choice Behavior  info:mesh/Decision Making  info:mesh/Young Adult  info:mesh/Cognition  info:mesh/Humans  info:mesh/Adult  info:mesh/Electroshock  info:mesh/Cues  info:mesh/Morals  info:mesh/Questionnaires  info:mesh/Male  info:mesh/Female  Humans   Questionnaires   Electroshock   Morals   Cognition   Cues   Decision Making   Choice Behavior   Adult   Female   Male   Young Adult
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,003
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How Does Moral Judgment Work.Joshua Greene & Jonathan Haidt - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):517-523.
Thinking the Unthinkable: Sacred Values and Taboo Cognitions.Philip E. Tetlock - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (7):320-324.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-30

Total downloads
7 ( #639,693 of 2,293,920 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #184,525 of 2,293,920 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature