Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making

Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (6):311-315 (2006)
Aim: To improve clinical and ethical understanding of patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making.Objectives: To develop and evaluate a clinical tool to elicit these preferences and to consider the ethical issues raised.Design: A before and after study.Setting: Three UK hospices.Participants: Patients with advanced life-threatening illnesses and their doctors.Intervention: Questionnaire on information and decision-making preferences.Main outcome measures: Patient-based outcome measures were satisfaction with the amount of information given, with the way information was given, with family or carer information, and confidence about future decision making. Doctor-based outcome measures were confidence in matching information to patient preference, matching family or carer communication to patient preference, knowing patient preferences and matching future decision making with patient preference.Results: Of 336 admissions, 101 patients completed the study . Patient satisfaction with the way information was given and family communication improved after introduction of the tool. Doctor confidence improved across all outcome measures .Conclusions: Patient satisfaction and doctor confidence were improved by administering the questionnaire, but complex ethical issues were raised by implementing and applying this research. The balance of ethical considerations were changed by advanced life-threatening illness, because there is increased risk of harm through delivery of information discordant with the patient’s own preferences. The importance of truly understanding patient preferences towards the end of life is highlighted by this study
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2005.012484
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,484
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Physician-Patient Relations: No More Models.Greg Clarke, Robert T. Hall & Greg Rosencrance - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):16 – 19.
An Outcomes Model of Medical Decision Making.Joanne Lynn & David Degrazia - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).
Negotiation and Defeasible Decision Making.Fernando Tohmé - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (4):289-311.
Patient Preferences for Physician Persuasion Strategies.Dan O'Hair - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
3 ( #816,954 of 2,268,045 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #373,178 of 2,268,045 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature