Almost weakly 2-generic sets

Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):868-887 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a family of questions in relativized complexity theory--weak analogs of the Friedberg Jump-Inversion Theorem--that are resolved by 1-generic sets but which cannot be resolved by essentially any weaker notion of genericity. This paper defines aw2-generic sets. i.e., sets which meet every dense set of strings that is r.e. in some incomplete r.e. set. Aw2-generic sets are very close to 1-generic sets in strength, but are too weak to resolve these questions. In particular, it is shown that for any set X there is an aw2-generic set G such that $\mathbf{NP}^G \cap co-\mathbf{NP}^G \nsubseteq \mathbf{P}^{G \oplus X}$ . (On the other hand, if G is 1-generic, then $\mathbf{NP}^G \cap co-\mathbf{NP}^G \subseteq \mathbf{P}^{G \oplus \mathrm{SAT}}$ . where SAT is the NP-complete satisfiability problem [6].) This result runs counter to the fact that most finite extension constructions in complexity theory can be made effective. These results imply that any finite extension construction that ensures any of the Friedberg analogs must be noneffective, even relative to an arbitrary incomplete r.e. set. It is then shown that the recursion theoretic properties of aw2-generic sets differ radically from those of 1-generic sets: every degree above O' contains an aw2-generic set: no aw2-generic set exists below any incomplete r.e. set; there is an aw2-generic set which is the join of two Turing equivalent aw2-generic sets. Finally, a result of Shore is presented [30] which states that every degree above 0' is the jump of an aw2-generic degree

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On generic extensions without the axiom of choice.G. P. Monro - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (1):39-52.
The degrees below a 1-generic degree $.Christine Ann Haught - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (3):770 - 777.
On non-wellfounded iterations of the perfect set forcing.Vladimir Kanovei - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):551-574.
Ultrafilters on the natural numbers.Christopher Barney - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (3):764-784.
Recursively enumerable generic sets.Wolfgang Maass - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (4):809-823.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#219,215)

6 months
13 (#200,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability.Hartley Rogers - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1):141-146.
Some applications of forcing to hierarchy problems in arithmetic.Peter G. Hinman - 1969 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 15 (20-22):341-352.
Some applications of forcing to hierarchy problems in arithmetic.Peter G. Hinman - 1969 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 15 (20‐22):341-352.
Minimal degrees recursive in 1-generic degrees.C. T. Chong & R. G. Downey - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 48 (3):215-225.

Add more references