Authors
Gene Fendt
University of Nebraska at Kearney
Abstract
Pamphilus’ introductory letter opens contradictory ways of reading Hume’s Dialogues. The first, suggested by Pamphilus' claim to be “mere auditor” to the dialogues, which were “deeply imprinted in [his] memory,” is the empiricist reading. This traditional reading could, and has, gone several ways, including to such conclusions as Philo forces upon Cleanthes, shocking Demea; e.g., that the design of the mosquito and other “curious artifices of nature,” which inflict pain and suffering on all, bespeaks an utterly careless and insensate, if not malign creator. Pamphilus' preface also opens a more philosophical reading implied in his consideration of the ancient literary form of dialogue. This second interpretive path suspects more design in writing, and more revealed in it, than the simple empiricist reading(s) allow. Dialogically elucidating the Dialogues confronts us with the limits of empiricism in moral and religious philosophy. Hume's last work, if read philosophically, exhibits the vacancy of empiricism.
Keywords Hume  Limits of Empiricism  Problem of evil  Dialogue form  tabula rasa  empiricist ethics  justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/ipq2021419170
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,700
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Empiricism Coherent?Albert Casullo - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:61-74.
The Marxist Dialectical Method and Dialectical Logic.Ch'ieh Ta-Yu - 1970 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 1 (2/3):223.
On What Empiricism Cannot Be.Alexander Bozzo - 2016 - Metaphilosophy 47 (2):181-198.
The Anthropological Consequences of the Evolution of Empiricism.Dawid Misztal - 2012 - Hybris. Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny 19:075-092.
Dialectical Thinking in Empirical Analysis.Philip Arnold Moritz - 1967 - Taunton (Som.), Martigan Publications.
On the Question of the Object of Dialectical Logic.Qie Dayou - 1976 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 7 (3):101-105.
On the Question of the Object of Dialectical Logic.Qie Dayou - 1981 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 12 (3):101-105.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-20

Total views
3 ( #1,300,255 of 2,432,375 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #214,198 of 2,432,375 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes