Heythrop Journal 46 (2):149–166 (2005)
This paper argues that Monologion and Proslogion though distinguishable are not really separable. They are distinct as "the way in" and "the way when one is in" but "the way in" reveals itself as a discovery of already being in; thus these ways are distinct in act, but not in being. Monologion moves from imaginary ignorance to real reverence, while Proslogion begins within reverence to achieve understanding.
|Keywords||ontological argument Augustinianism Monologion Proslogion Anselm meditation degrees of justice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
'Ontological' Arguments From Experience: Daniel A. Dombrowski, Iris Murdoch, and the Nature of Divine Reality.Elizabeth D. Burns - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):459-480.
Similar books and articles
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate.
The Elusive Face of Modern Platonism.F. B. A. Asiedu - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):393-410.
Mercy and Justice in St. Anselm's Proslogion.Gregory B. Sadler - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):41-61.
The Non-Christian Influence on Anselm's Proslogion Argument.Nancy Kendrick - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):73-89.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #110,504 of 2,154,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,685 of 2,154,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?