A computational interpretation of conceptivism

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24 (4):333-367 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The hallmark of the deductive systems known as ‘conceptivist’ or ‘containment’ logics is that for all theorems of the form , all atomic formulae appearing in also appear in . Significantly, as a consequence, the principle of Addition fails. While often billed as a formalisation of Kantian analytic judgements, once semantics were discovered for these systems, the approach was largely discounted as merely the imposition of a syntactic filter on unrelated systems. In this paper, we examine a number of prima facie unrelated deductive contexts in which Addition fails and attempt to harmonise them by developing a computational interpretation of conceptivist logics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abstract modal logics.Ramon Jansana - 1995 - Studia Logica 55 (2):273 - 299.
Refutation systems in modal logic.Valentin Goranko - 1994 - Studia Logica 53 (2):299 - 324.
A comparison between monoidal and substructural logics.Clayton Peterson - 2016 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 26 (2):126-159.
Natural deduction calculi for classical and intuitionistic S5.S. Guerrini, A. Masini & M. Zorzi - 2023 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 33 (2):165-205.
CWA Extensions to Multi-Valued Logics.Jinzhao Wu - 2003 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 (2):133-164.
Meet-Combination of Consequence Systems.Paula Gouveia, João Rasga & Cristina Sernadas - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-15

Downloads
98 (#185,978)

6 months
10 (#312,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Ferguson
City University of New York

Citations of this work

The Fundamental Problem of Logical Omniscience.Peter Hawke, Aybüke Özgün & Francesco Berto - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (4):727-766.
Simple Hyperintensional Belief Revision.F. Berto - 2018 - Erkenntnis 84 (3):559-575.
Semantical analysis of weak Kleene logics.Roberto Ciuni & Massimiliano Carrara - 2019 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 29 (1):1-36.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and belief.Jaakko Hintikka - 1962 - Ithaca, N.Y.,: Cornell University Press.
Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.
The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.

View all 57 references / Add more references