Agency, Scarcity, and Mortality

The Journal of Ethics 19 (3-4):349-378 (2015)

Luca Ferrero
University of California, Riverside
It is often argued, most recently by Samuel Scheffler, that we should reconcile with our mortality as constitutive of our existence: as essential to its temporal structure, to the nature of deliberation, and to our basic motivations and values. Against this reconciliatory strategy, I argue that there is a kind of immortal existence that is coherently conceivable and potentially desirable. First, I argue against the claim that our existence has a temporal structure with a trajectory that necessarily culminates in an ending. This claim is based on two false assumptions: that a life as a whole calls for narrative structure, and that narratives necessarily require closure as temporal endings. Second, I reject the proposal that temporal finitude is constitutive of the basic elements of diachronic agency, including the nature of deliberation and of our values. I argue that only finitude as scarcity of opportunities is constitutive of these elements. Additionally, scarcity might be present in an endless existence. Therefore, it is not incoherent to conceive of a recognizable and potentially desirable immortality that grounds the core features of diachronic agency. Thus, against the reconciliatory strategy, I conclude that we might never fully reconcile with mortality. Although we might embrace our inescapable mortality as essential to a fuller range of features of our existence, we can still justifiably regret our missing on an immortal existence.
Keywords Death  Mortality  Immortality  Scheffler  Scarcity  Diachronic Agency  Narrative
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10892-015-9207-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Problems of the Self.Bernard A. O. Williams - 1973 - Cambridge University Press.
The Therapy of Desire.Martha Nussbaum - 1994 - Princeton University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bootstrapping the Afterlife.Roman Altshuler - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Séance with an Immortal.Roy Sorensen - 2006 - Philosophy 81 (3):395-416.
Time, Value, and Collective Immortality.Michael Cholbi - 2015 - The Journal of Ethics 19 (2):197-211.
The Shmagency Question.Matthew Silverstein - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1127-1142.
On Being Dead with Derrida.Bob Plant - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (3):320-338.
Who Wants to Live Forever? Immortality, Authenticity, and Living Forever in the Present.Ted M. Preston & Scott Dixon - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):99-117.
Scarcity and Saving Lives.Danny Frederick - 2011 - The Reasoner 5 (6):89-90.
Mind the Gap! Three Approaches to Scarcity in Health Care.Yvonne Denier - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (1):73-87.
Is Rawlsian Justice Bad for the Environment?Thomas Schramme - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (2):146-157.
Mortality, Agency, and Regret.Connie S. Rosati - 2007 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 94 (1):231-259.


Added to PP index

Total views
310 ( #18,697 of 2,264,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
74 ( #8,565 of 2,264,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature