Philosophy Compass 12 (12):e12459 (2017)

Authors
Luara Ferracioli
University of Sydney
Abstract
Philosophical discussion about citizenship has traditionally focused on the questions of what citizenship is, its relationship to civic virtue and political participation, and whether or not it can be meaningfully exercised at the supra-national level. In recent years, however, philosophers have turned their attention to the legal status attached to citizenship, and have questioned existing principles of citizenship allocation and withdrawal. With regard to the question of who is morally entitled to citizenship, philosophers have argued for principles of citizenship allocation that go beyond birth and lineage, and have focused instead on the value of political attachment and located life plans. These principles have several advantages over existing legal principles, but they suffer from being under-specified, as well as being over and under-inclusive. With regard to loss of citizenship, philosophers have primarily denounced citizenship withdrawal as a form of punishment by appealing to principles of fair and equal treatment. However, theories purporting to show that denationalization is always wrong have trouble explaining why loss of citizenship is so problematic for persons who have committed the most horrendous crimes against their fellow citizens, and who, in so doing, have in effect self-excluded from the political community.
Keywords citizenship  denationalisation  naturalisation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.12459
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):63-64.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Territorial Exclusion: An Argument Against Closed Borders.Daniel Weltman - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 19 (3):257-90.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Normative Limits of Consumer Citizenship.Angela Kallhoff - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (1):23-34.
Environment and Citizenship: Integrating Justice, Responsibility and Civic Engagement.Mark J. Smith - 2008 - Distributed in the Usa Exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan.
Selling Citizenship: A Defence.Javier Hidalgo - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (3):223-239.
Citizenship, Inc.Wayne Norman - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):1-26.
Dialectics of Citizenship.Ruth Lister - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (4):6-26.
Global Government and Global Citizenship.Alan Tomhave - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):287-297.
Citizenship and the Environment.Andrew Dobson - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Political Space of Ecological Citizenship.Jelena Vasiljevic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (1):102-111.
European Citizenship: Towards a European Identity?B. P. - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (3):239-282.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-08-23

Total views
314 ( #30,764 of 2,462,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,313 of 2,462,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes