Gender and Society 2 (1):82-89 (1988)
AbstractReferences to publications written by women constitute a significantly larger proportion of citations in articles written by women than in articles written by men in the same subfields. Further, the difference between citation patterns of men and women authors increases as the proportion of women in the discipline decreases, showing that these women are doubly disadvantaged in accumulating citations. These results suggest that the problems of members of an out-group tend to be most serious when their numbers are small and that they will find it increasingly easier to gain acceptance and recognition as their numbers increase.
Similar books and articles
A New Gnomologium: With Some Remarks on Gnomic Anthologies, II.John Barns - 1951 - Classical Quarterly 1 (1-2):1-19.
Objectivity, Diversity, and Uptake: On the Status of Women in Philosophy.Michelle Ciurria - 2017 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 3 (3):1-23.
Unraveling Scientific Impact: Citation types in marketing journals.S. Stremersch, N. M. A. Camacho, S. Vanneste & I. W. J. Verniers - 2015 - International Journal of Research in Marketing 32 (1):64-77.
Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements.Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti, Istvan S. Szilagyi & Andreas Sandner-Kiesling - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1063-1072.
Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct.Anne Victoria Neale, Rhonda K. Dailey & Judith Abrams - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):251-261.
MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.Cameron Neylon, Bert Gordijn, Martin Paul Eve & Mohammad Hosseini - 2020 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 5 (1).
A study on journal self-citations and intra-citing within the subject category of multidisciplinary sciences.Jong Yong Abdiel Foo - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):491-501.
Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals.Stefan Stremersch, Nuno Camacho, Sofie Vanneste & Isabel Verniers - unknown
Propagation of errors in citation networks: a study involving the entire citation network of a widely cited paper published in, and later retracted from, the journal Nature.Harm Nijveen & Paul E. van der Vet - 2016 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1).
The ethics of citation: copyright law and good manners.Sybilla Stanisławska–Kloc - 2009 - Diametros:160-184.
The Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks.Charisse R. Madlock-Brown & David Eichmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):127-137.
How is a revolutionary scientific paper cited?: the case of Hess’ “History of Ocean Basins”.K. Brad Wray - 2020 - Scientometrics 124:1677–1683.
Dimensions of Citation Analysis.Olga Amsterdamska & Loet Leydesdorff - 1990 - Science, Technology and Human Values 15 (3):305-335.
Where Credit Is Due: Assessing the Visibility of Articles Published in Gender & Society with Google Scholar.Jerry A. Jacobs - 2009 - Gender and Society 23 (6):817-832.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why gender is a relevant factor in the social epistemology of scientific inquiry.Kristina Rolin - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):880-891.
References found in this work
No references found.