Cheshire Calhoun's Project of Separating Lesbian Theory from Feminist Theory

Hypatia 13 (1):214 - 223 (1998)
I support Cheshire Calhoun's argument that there is a distinctive type of sexuality injustice addressed to lesbians and gays, but challenge her definitional strategy regarding the concepts of "lesbian" and "gay" and the "universalistic essentialist" distinction that she draws between patriarchy and compulsory heterosexuality. Finally, I take issue with the political implications of her claim that lesbians' and gays' special oppression stems from our exclusion from the legal prerogatives of marriage and parenthood.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,479
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Cheshire Calhoun (1995). Sexuality Injustice. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 9 (1):241-274.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Carolyn Ells (2001). Shifting the Autonomy Debate to Theory as Ideology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):417 – 430.
Cheshire Calhoun (2008). Sex and Ethics. Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):635-639.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

22 ( #214,108 of 1,925,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,517 of 1,925,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.