Religious Studies 28 (2):185-194 (1992)

Ever since the Proslogion was first circulated , critics have been bemused by St Anselm's brazen attempt to establish a matter of fact, namely, God's existence, from the simple analysis of a term or concept. Yet every critic who has proposed to ‘write the obituary’ of the Ontological Argument has found it to be remarkably resilient . At the risk of adding to a record of failures, I want to venture a new method for attacking this durable argument. Neither the common version of Anselm's argument from Chapter II of the Proslogion nor the previously unrecognized modal version uncovered by Norman Malcolm from Pros , III can possibly get under way without Anselm's celebrated assertion that God is that than which no greater can be conceived
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500021533
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,244
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Existing by Convention.Kenneth G. Ferguson - 1992 - Religious Studies 28 (2):185 - 194.
The Ontological Argument.Stephen Makin - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (243):83 - 91.
Anselm's Neglected Argument.Brian Leftow - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
A Simple Version of Anselm's Argument.Forrest E. Baird - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):245-249.
Anselm's "Proslogion" Argument: A Metaphysics of Creation.Floyd Edwin Wike - 1980 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
What Does the Second Form of the Ontological Argument Prove?H. Jong Kim - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (1):17 - 40.
Anselm and Russell.Maciej Nowicki - 2006 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (4):355-368.
Saint Anselm.Thomas Williams - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #408,021 of 2,455,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes