Ferrajoli's Argument for Structural Entrenchment

Res Publica 17 (4):377-383 (2011)
Abstract
This paper engages with Ferrajoli’s contribution to the philosophical debate on constitutional democracy and in particular his conception of ‘structural entrenchment’, or the basis upon which one can defend the normativity of the Constitution as ‘higher law’, which can trump or limit legislation, without infringing democratic principles. Ferrajoli’s own understanding of ‘structural entrenchment’ is compared to Rawls’s and Dworkin’s arguments in support of it. Ferrajoli’s position is neither grounded on a philosophy of history, as in Rawls, nor on a version of moral realism, as for Dworkin, but on a formal understanding of the nature of fundamental rights, and in a conception of democratic sovereignty as ‘joint ownership.’
Keywords Constitutional democracy  Structural entrenchment  Illegittimate law  Constitutional amendments  Fundamental rights
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-011-9171-1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition.John Rawls - 2005 - Columbia University Press.
Brennan and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman - 2005 - Princeton University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reading Principia Iuris.Pietro Costa - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):317-325.
Introduction.Dario Castiglione - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):311-315.
An Axiomatic Theory of Law.Paolo Sandro - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):343-354.
Basic Entrenchment.Hans Rott - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (2):257 - 280.
Structural Realism: Continuity and its Limits.Ioannis Votsis - 2011 - In Alisa Bokulich & Peter Bokulich (eds.), Scientific Structuralism. Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 105--117.
Is Structural Underdetermination Possible?Holger Lyre - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):235 - 247.
Recent Debates Over Structural Realism.Daniel McArthur - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):209 - 224.
Mathematical Structural Realism.Chris Pincock - 2011 - In Alisa Bokulich & Peter Bokulich (eds.), Scientific Structuralism.
Added to PP index
2011-08-22

Total downloads
17 ( #290,673 of 2,191,918 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #59,259 of 2,191,918 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature