Philosophical Explorations 20 (sup2):13-39 (2017)

Authors
Luca Ferrero
University of California, Riverside
Abstract
I argue that intending and acting belong to the same genus: intending is a kind of doing continuous in structure with intentional acting. Future-directed intending is not a truly separate phenomenon from either the intending in action or the acting itself. Ultimately, all intentions are in action, or better still, in extended courses of action. I show how the intuitive distinction between intending and acting is based on modeling the two phenomena on the extreme and limiting cases of an otherwise continuous spectrum of the ways in which agents exercise rational active intelligent guidance in the pursuit of goals. I argue that diachronic intentional agency is better understood in terms of continuity and unity of courses of active and intelligent guidance, and that the distinction between intending to do something and doing it is only a derivative and context-dependent segmentation of these continuous courses of rational active intelligent guidance.
Keywords Intention  Action
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/13869795.2017.1356353
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,518
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Making It Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.
Normative Requirements.John Broome - 1999 - Ratio 12 (4):398–419.
Structures of Agency: Essays.Michael E. Bratman - 2007 - Oxford University Press.

View all 49 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intention.Kieran Setiya - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Philosophy of Computer Science.Raymond Turner - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Autonomous Reasons for Intending.Randolph Clarke - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):191 – 212.
Can I Only Intend My Own Actions?Luca Ferrero - 2013 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Action and Responsibility. Oxford University Press. pp. (1) 70-94.
A Causal Theory of Intending.Wayne A. Davis - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1):43-54.
Narrative and the Stability of Intention.Edward S. Hinchman - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):111-140.
A Not-so-Simple View of Intentional Action.David K. Chan - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):1–16.
The Intentional and the Intended.J. L. A. Garcia - 1990 - Erkenntnis 33 (2):191 - 209.
Intending, Settling, and Relying.Facundo M. Alonso - 2017 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility. Volume 4. Oxford University Press. pp. 50-74.
Intending and Acting: Toward a Naturalized Action Theory. [REVIEW]Terence Horgan - 1987 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 29 (1):171-180.
Intending and Acting: Toward a Naturalized Action Theory.Lawrence H. Davis - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (3):506-511.
What Are Conditional Intentions?Kirk Ludwig - 2015 - Methode: Analytic Perspectives 4 (6):30-60.
A Causal Theory of Intending.Robert K. Shope - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:361-394.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-26

Total views
164 ( #59,795 of 2,421,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #57,376 of 2,421,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes