Kant's Proleptic Philosophy of History: The World Well-Hoped

Dissertation, Temple University (2019)

Authors
José Luis Fernández
Fairfield University
Abstract
My dissertation examines several proleptic bases running through Immanuel Kant’s philosophy of history. The approach that I take is both problem centered and exegetical, drawing from primary literature as well as classic and contemporary research. After setting preliminary ground to frame Kant’s hopeful historical viewpoint, I attempt to address and answer problems such as “the historical antinomy” by trying to build a bridge between reason and empirical history; to extricate Kant from membership in a group of “substantive philosophers of history,” who all share the characteristic of presenting “prophetic” accounts of the historical future; as well to offer an original reading of Kant’s use of Seneca’s phrase, “Ducunt volentum fata, nolentem trahunt,” as it appears in two of the socio-political essays. Ultimately, I argue that it would be a betrayal of Kantian hope to forfeit the presumption, however unknowable, that there are teleological principles operating in history, thereby resigning ourselves to the “dismal reign of chance” (trostloses Ungefähr), an historical caveat that humanity cannot afford to dismiss.
Keywords philosophy of history, hope, progress
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,583
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bridging the Gap of Kant’s ‘Historical Antinomy’.José Luis Fernández - 2017 - Southwest Philosophy Review 33 (1):215-223.
Richard Rorty’s ‘Post-Kantian’ Philosophy of History.Loren Goldman - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 9 (3):410-443.
Kant's Biological Conception of History.Alix Cohen - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (1):1-28.
Kant's Political Theory and Philosophy of History.Philip J. Kain - 1989 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 18 (4):325-45.
Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development.Pauline Kleingeld - 1999 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1):59-80.
In Defense of Blinders.Loren Goldman - 2012 - Political Theory 40 (4):497-523.
The History of Philosophy as Philosophy.Gary Hatfield - 2005 - In Tom Sorell & G. A. J. Rogers (eds.), Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 82-128.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-24

Total views
12 ( #625,426 of 2,249,161 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #85,952 of 2,249,161 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature