ABSTRACT According to the material-heuristics hypothesis, people’s socioeconomic position affects their perceptions about the socioeconomic environment, including how society distributes opportunities and rewards and to what extent people are responsible for their own economic situation. These perceptions, in turn, affect attitudes toward wealth redistribution. In contrast to the material-heuristics hypothesis are the more familiar material self-interest hypothesis, which relates redistributive attitudes to one’s personal interest in gaining or losing from redistribution; and the self-serving reasoning hypothesis, according to which perceptions of how society distributes opportunities and rewards are a consequence rather than a cause of attitudes toward redistribution, which are, in turn, driven by material self-interest. All three hypotheses connect socioeconomic position and attitudes toward redistribution, but only the material-heuristics and the self-serving reasoning arguments account for why perceptions of the causes of wealth and poverty vary across economic groups and why this variation matters for attitudes toward redistribution. Ignoring the role of such perceptions can lead to the simplistic attribution of attitudes toward redistribution to personal self-interest.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913811.2021.1928943
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,178
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964).Philip E. Converse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):1-74.
How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence.Arthur Lupia - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):217-232.
Is Public Opinion an Illusion?Benjamin I. Page - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):35-45.
The Politics Of Motivation.James Druckman - 2012 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (2):199-216.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Heuristics in Technoscientific Thinking.Michael E. Gorman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):752-752.
Automated Choice Heuristics.Shane Frederick - 2002 - In . Cambridge University Press. pp. 548-558.
Psychological Research on Heuristics Meets the Law.Christoph Engel - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):747-747.
How Smart Can Simple Heuristics Be?Nick Chater - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):745-746.
Vague Heuristics.María G. Navarro - 2015 - In Rudolf Seising and Luis Argüelles (ed.), Conjectures, Hypotheses, and Fuzzy Logic. Springer. pp. 281-294.
Smart People Who Make Simple Heuristics Work.Annika Wallin & Peter Gärdenfors - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-765.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,508,638 of 2,454,953 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,233 of 2,454,953 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes