Paternalism versus autonomy: medical opinion and ethical questions in the treatment of defective neonates

Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (1):16-17 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author considers the notion that the doctor is the sole arbiter of what happens to a defective neonate; how this is a logical confusion of scientific assessment with value judgment. The utilitarian concept found in a democracy is taken to be the superior source of ethics which ought to guide doctors. Finally, the logical conclusion is claimed to be that legislation alone will effectively enunciate society's standards

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The sense of suffering.Mary C. Rawlinson - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):39-62.
Wrong medicine: doctors, patients, and futile treatment.L. J. Schneiderman - 1995 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Edited by Nancy Ann Silbergeld Jecker.
Autonomy, consent and the law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Routledge-Cavendish.
Solidarity in perinatal medicine.B. Cadore, P. Boitte, G. Demuijnck, D. Greiner & D. Jacquemin - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):435-454.
Who should decide?: Paternalism in health care.James F. Childress - 1982 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A definition for paternalism.Paul Turner Hershey - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):171-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Unmasking of Medicine.Ian Kennedy - 1981 - Allen & Unwin Australia.

Add more references