Symposium on explanations and social ontology 1: Rational choice theory and social explanation

Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):211-234 (2002)
In the Common Mind, Pettit argues that rational choice theory cannot provide genuine causal accounts of action. A genuine causal explanation of intentional action must track how people actually deliberate to arrive at action. And, deliberation is necessarily enculturated or situated “. . . we take human agents to reason their way to action, using the concepts that are available to them in the currency of their culture” (p. 220). When deciding how to act, “. . . people find their way to action in response to properties that they register in the options before them, properties that are valued in common with others and that can be invoked to provide at least some justification of their choices” (p. 272). That people seek to make justified decisions implies that, at times, their own goals or objectives will be modified in deliberation. Something that rational choice theory cannot allow.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S026626710200202X
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,158
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Bayesian Boom: Good Thing or Bad?Ulrike Hahn - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

113 ( #40,676 of 2,133,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #384,179 of 2,133,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums