The role of current affect, anticipated affect and spontaneous self-affirmation in decisions to receive self-threatening genetic risk information
Rebecca A. Ferrer, Jennifer M. Taber, William M. P. Klein, Peter R. Harris, Katie L. Lewis & Leslie G. Biesecker
Cognition and Emotion 29 (8):1456-1465 (2015)
AbstractThis article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Affect and Information Processing Strategies: An Interactive Relationship.Joseph P. Forgas - 2000 - In Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 253--280.
Why Tell Asymptomatic Children of the Risk of an Adult-Onset Disease in the Family but Not Test Them for It?P. J. Malpas - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):639-642.
Protecting Posted Genes: Social Networking and the Limits of GINA.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & Emily Borgelt - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):32-44.
Genomics and Equal Opportunity Ethics.A. W. Cappelen, O. F. Norheim & B. Tungodden - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):361-364.
The Social Nature of Engineering and its Implications for Risk Taking.Allison Ross & Nafsika Athanassoulis - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):147-168.
Risk and the Value of Information in Irreversible Decisions.Hans Gersbach - 1997 - Theory and Decision 42 (1):37-51.
Psychological Aspects of Individualized Choice and Reproductive Autonomy in Prenatal Screening.Jenny Hewison - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):9-18.
Nonconscious and Noncognitive Affect.R. B. Zajonc - 2000 - In Joseph P. Forgas (ed.), Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 31--58.
Stopping Trials Early for Commercial Reasons: The Risk-Benefit Relationship as a Moral Compass.A. S. Iltis - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):410-414.
Genes, Justice, and Obligations to Future People.F. M. Kamm - 2002 - Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):360-388.
How the Object of Affect Guides its Impact.Gerald L. Clore & Jeffrey R. Huntsinger - 2009 - Emotion Review 1 (1):39-54.
The Nature and Significance of Behavioural Genetic Information.Ainsley Newson - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (2):89-111.
The Use of Genetic Test Information in Insurance: The Argument From Indistinguishability Reconsidered. [REVIEW]Dr V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.