A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context

Argumentation 16 (3):349-367 (2002)

Eveline Feteris
University of Amsterdam
This paper answers the question how pragmatic argumentation which occurs in a legal context, can be analyzed and evaluated adequately. First, the author surveys various ideas taken from argumentation theory and legal theory on the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation. Then, on the basis of these ideas, she develops a pragma-dialectical instrument for analyzing and evaluating pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Finally she demonstrates how this instrument can be used by giving an exemplary analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a decision of the Dutch Supreme Court
Keywords argumentation theory  causal argumentation  consequentialist argumentation  evaluation of argumentation  legal argumentation  legal interpretation  policy arguments  practical syllogism in legal argumentation  pragmatic argumentation  teleological argumentation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1019999606665
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The 2015 Paris Climate Conference.Marcin Lewiński & Dima Mohammed - 2019 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (1):65-90.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.


Added to PP index

Total views
47 ( #174,154 of 2,260,782 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #202,825 of 2,260,782 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature