Argumentation 16 (3):349-367 (2002)

Eveline Feteris
University of Amsterdam
This paper answers the question how pragmatic argumentation which occurs in a legal context, can be analyzed and evaluated adequately. First, the author surveys various ideas taken from argumentation theory and legal theory on the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation. Then, on the basis of these ideas, she develops a pragma-dialectical instrument for analyzing and evaluating pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Finally she demonstrates how this instrument can be used by giving an exemplary analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a decision of the Dutch Supreme Court
Keywords argumentation theory  causal argumentation  consequentialist argumentation  evaluation of argumentation  legal argumentation  legal interpretation  policy arguments  practical syllogism in legal argumentation  pragmatic argumentation  teleological argumentation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1019999606665
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,261
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Law’s Empire.R. Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
The Language of Morals.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1952 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Norm and Action.G. H. von Wright - 1963 - New York: Humanities.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The 2015 Paris Climate Conference.Marcin Lewiński & Dima Mohammed - 2019 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (1):65-90.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.


Added to PP index

Total views
73 ( #148,722 of 2,455,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,332 of 2,455,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes