Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives'

Argumentation 14 (3):235-239 (2000)

Authors
Eveline Feteris
University of Amsterdam
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1007896828212
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rhetoric and Philosophy in Plato's Phaedrus.Daniel Werner - 2010 - Greece and Rome 57 (1):21-46.
A Case for Kenneth Burke's Dialectic and Rhetoric.Timothy W. Crusius - 1986 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 19 (1):23 - 37.
Can Rhetoric and Dialectic Serve the Purposes of Logic?William D. Harpine - 1985 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 18 (2):96 - 112.
Historical Perspectives on Legal Pluralism.Lauren Benton - 2012 - In Brian Z. Tamanaha, Caroline Mary Sage & Michael J. V. Woolcock (eds.), Legal Pluralism and Development: Scholars and Practitioners in Dialogue. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-11

Total views
19 ( #474,969 of 2,280,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #835,594 of 2,280,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature