Argumentation 30 (1):61-79 (2016)

Eveline Feteris
University of Amsterdam
In this contribution the prototypical argumentative patterns are discussed in which pragmatic argumentation is used in the context of legal justification in hard cases. First, the function and implementation of pragmatic argumentation in prototypical argumentative patterns in legal justification are addressed. The dialectical function of the different parts of the complex argumentation are explained by characterizing them as argumentative moves that are put forward in reaction to certain forms of critique. Then, on the basis of an exemplary case, the famous Holy Trinity case, the way in which the U.S. Supreme Court uses pragmatic argumentation in this case is discussed by showing how the court instantiates general prototypical argumentative patterns in light of the institutional preconditions of the justification in the context of the specific case.
Keywords Argumentative pattern  Legal interpretation  Legal justification  Legal rule  Pragmatic argumentation  Prototypical argumentative pattern  Statutory rule
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-015-9376-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory.Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - Oxford University Press.
On Law and Reason.Aleksander Peczenik - 1989 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.
Rhetoric and the Rule of Law.Neil MacCormick - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:51-67.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Context-Dependency of Argumentative Patterns in Discourse.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2017 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 6 (1):3-26.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

DiaLaw. On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 1999 - Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #315,165 of 2,462,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes