PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:377 - 391 (1974)
The thesis of this paper is that extensional language alone provides an essentially inadequate foundation for the logical formalization of any lawlike statement. The arguments presented are intended to demonstrate that lawlike sentences are logically general dispositional statements requiring an essentially intensional reduction sentence formulation. By introducing a non-extensional logical operator, the 'fork', the difference between universal and statistical laws emerges in a distinction between dispositional predicates of universal strength as opposed to those of merely statistical strength. While the logical form of universal and statistical laws appears to be fundamentally dissimilar on the standard account, from this point of view their syntactical structure is basically the same.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Logical Form of Universal Generalizations.Alice Drewery - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):373 – 393.
Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic Explanation.Carl G. Hempel - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (2):116-133.
What is 'Normal'? An Evolution-Theoretic Foundation for Normic Laws and Their Relation to Statistical Normality.Gerhard Schurz - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (4):476-497.
Teleology and Logical Form.Andrew Kernohan - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):27-34.
Logical Forms.Oswaldo Chateaubriand - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:161-182.
Allometries and Scaling Laws Interpreted as Laws: A Reply to Elgin.Jani Raerinne - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):99-111.
Popper on Laws and Counterfactuals.Danilo Šuster - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):109-119.
Can Dispositional Essences Ground the Laws of Nature?Richard Corry - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):263 - 275.
The Logical Status of Natural Laws.R. A. Sharpe - 1964 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):414-416.
In Defence Of Popper On The Logical Possibility Of Universal Laws: A Reply To Contessa.Darrell Rowbottom - 2006 - Philosophical Writings 31 (1).
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads122 ( #39,788 of 2,169,144 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,285 of 2,169,144 )
How can I increase my downloads?