The Likeness of Lawlikeness

Abstract
The thesis of this paper is that extensional language alone provides an essentially inadequate foundation for the logical formalization of any lawlike statement. The arguments presented are intended to demonstrate that lawlike sentences are logically general dispositional statements requiring an essentially intensional reduction sentence formulation. By introducing a non-extensional logical operator, the 'fork', the difference between universal and statistical laws emerges in a distinction between dispositional predicates of universal strength as opposed to those of merely statistical strength. While the logical form of universal and statistical laws appears to be fundamentally dissimilar on the standard account, from this point of view their syntactical structure is basically the same.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Logical Form of Universal Generalizations.Alice Drewery - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):373 – 393.
Kinds and Criteria of Scientific Laws.Mario Bunge - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):260-281.
Lawlikeness and the End of Science.C. Z. Elgin - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (1):56-68.
Teleology and Logical Form.Andrew Kernohan - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):27-34.
Logical Forms.Oswaldo Chateaubriand - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:161-182.
Popper on Laws and Counterfactuals.Danilo Šuster - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):109-119.
Can Dispositional Essences Ground the Laws of Nature?Richard Corry - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):263 - 275.
The Logical Status of Natural Laws.R. A. Sharpe - 1964 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):414-416.
Laws of Nature.Fred I. Dretske - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (2):248-268.
Structuring the Universe of Universal Logic.Vladimir L. Vasyukov - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (2):277-294.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

122 ( #39,788 of 2,169,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #186,285 of 2,169,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums