Argumentation 22 (4):489-506 (2008)

Eveline Feteris
University of Amsterdam
In this article the author develops a framework for a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of teleological argumentation in a legal context. Ideas taken from legal theory are integrated in a pragma-dialectical model for analyzing and evaluating argumentation, thus providing a more systematic and elaborate framework for assessing the quality of teleological arguments in a legal context. Teleological argumentation in a legal context is approached as a specific form of pragmatic argumentation. The legal criteria that are relevant for the evaluation of teleological argumentation are discussed and translated in terms of critical questions that are relevant for the evaluation of the various forms of teleological argumentation
Keywords Teleological argumentation  Pragmatic argumentation  Analysis of argumentation  Evaluation of argumentation  Critical question
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-008-9083-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,811
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Law and Reason.Aleksander Peczenik - 1989 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Same-Sex Marriage and the Spanish Constitution: The Linguistic-Legal Meaning Interface.Rina Villars - 2017 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30 (2):273-300.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.
Does Arguing From Coherence Make Sense?Stefano Bertea - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):433-446.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #500,835 of 2,463,160 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,391 of 2,463,160 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes