Informal Logic 23 (2):139-159 (2003)

Authors
Eveline Feteris
University of Amsterdam
Abstract
This paper argues that Habermas's conception of the rationality of moral and legal discussions has import for argumentation theorists interested in the rationality of public deliberations in politics and law. I begin with a survey of Haber mas's discourse theory and his criteria of rationality for moral and legal discourse. I then explain why, in his view, the forms of rational discourse in morality and law complement each other. My aim is to show how Habermas's account of this complementary relationship opens up fruitful perspectives for argumentation theory. Specifically, his thought can stimulate research regarding, on the one hand, the ways in which legal procedures provide for presumptively rational resolutions of moral disputes and, on the other hand, the applicability of ideal argumentation-theoretic models to the legal field. I conclude with a proposal for integrating Habermas's ideas in a research program for legal argumentation
Keywords rationality, legal argumentation, rational consensus, practical discourse
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A teoria discursiva da aplicação do Direito: o modelo de Habermas.Delamar José Volpato Dutra - 2006 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 51 (1):18-41.
The Legal Discourse of the Common Law: A Game of Chess.Anne Wagner - 2002 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 15 (4):345-360.
Practical-Theoritical Argumentation.Robert T. Craig - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (4):461-474.
Consensus and Cognitivism in Habermas's Discourse.Darrel Moellendorf - 2000 - South African Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):65-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
27 ( #408,077 of 2,455,626 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,626 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes