Consolations for the Specialist

In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. pp. 197 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,336

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Consolations of Philosophy. [REVIEW]Paul J. Bagley - 1990 - Review of Metaphysics 43 (4):879-882.
The consolations of philosophy: reflections in an economic downturn.Paul O'Grady (ed.) - 2011 - Blackrock, Co. Dublin: Columba Press.
Consolations. Ramakrishnananda - 1951 - Madras,: Sri Ramakrishna Math.
Consolations (from the letters of) Swami Ramakrishnanananda. Ramakrishnananda - 1945 - Madras,: Sri Ramakrishna Math.
The Consolations of Science.Joseph Agassi - 1986 - American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (2):129 - 141.
Review: The Consolations of Art. [REVIEW]Daniel Herwitz - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (1):51 - 55.
Shakespearian consolations.Brian Vickers - 1993 - In Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 82: 1992 Lectures and Memoirs. pp. 219-284.
Consolations for the irrationalist?Jerzy Giedymin - 1971 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):39-48.
The consolations of philosophy: Hobbes's secret, Spinoza's way.Henry M. Rosenthal - 1989 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Edited by Abigail L. Rosenthal.
The Consolations of Philosophy in George Grant.M. Darrol Bryant - 1985 - The Chesterton Review 11 (2):199-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
94 (#156,624)

6 months
6 (#160,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science.Justin Biddle - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):124-133.
The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo floresiensis.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):169-177.
Natural kinds.D. H. Mellor - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (4):299-312.

View all 123 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references