Democracy, elitism, and scientific method


Abstract
Scientific standards cannot be separated from the practice of science and their use presupposes immersion in this practice. The demand to base political action on scientific standards therefore leads to elitism. Democratic relativism, on the other hand, demands equal rights for all traditions or, conversely, a separation between the state and any one of the traditions it contains; for example, it demands the separation of state and science, state and humanitarianism, state and Christianity. Democratic relativism defends the rights of people to live as they see fit; it is also a most efficient means of probing traditions (such as ?scientific? medicine) that happen to be in the centre of attention: it has ethical as well as epistemological advantages
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201748008601890
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,650
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Review: Changing Patterns of Reconstruction. [REVIEW]Paul Feyerabend - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (4):351 - 369.
Killing Time.Paul Feyerabend - 1996 - University of Chicago Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Pluralist Challenge to 'Integrative Medicine': Feyerabend and Popper on the Cognitive Value of Alternative Medicine.Ian Kidd - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):392–400.
Citizen Virtues in a Technological Order.Langdon Winner - 1992 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (3-4):341 – 361.
II. Feyerabend's Democratic Relativism.Steven Yates - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):137-142.
Feyerabend, Rorty, Mouffe and Keane: On Realising Democracy.Thomas Clarke - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (3):81-118.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

II. Feyerabend's Democratic Relativism.Steven Yates - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):137-142.
Democracy and the Church-State Relationship.Howard P. Kainz - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 5 (3):251-258.
Science, Religion, and Democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2008 - Episteme 5 (1):pp. 5-18.
Methodological Pluralism, Normative Naturalism and the Realist Aim of Science.Howard Sankey - 2000 - In Howard Sankey & Robert Nola (eds.), After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 211-229.
Kuhn's Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense.Gerald Doppelt - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):33 – 86.
Reconsidering Feyerabend's 'Anarchism'.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
The Essential Tension in Science and Democracy.David Guston - 1993 - Social Epistemology 7 (1):3 – 23.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-30

Total views
88 ( #87,936 of 2,250,031 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #311,016 of 2,250,031 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature