Weierstrass's final theorem of arithmetic is not final

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (1):91-94 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on final causes.Laurence Carlin - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):217-233.
Mathematical roots of phenomenology: Husserl and the concept of number.Mirja Hartimo - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):319-337.
Intrinsicalism and conditionalism about final value.Jonas Olson - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):31-52.
The Problem of a Final Theory in Physics.Igor Nevvazhay - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:145-150.
The Final Foucault.James William Bernauer & David M. Rasmussen (eds.) - 1987 - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
A note on Goodman's theorem.Ulrich Kohlenbach - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (1):1-5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
20 (#703,484)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references