Acupuncture trials and informed consent

Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):43-44 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Participants are often not informed by investigators who conduct randomised, placebo-controlled acupuncture trials that they may receive a sham acupuncture intervention. Instead, they are told that one or more forms of acupuncture are being compared in the study. This deceptive disclosure practice lacks a compelling methodological rationale and violates the ethical requirement to obtain informed consent. Participants in placebo-controlled acupuncture trials should be provided an accurate disclosure regarding the use of sham acupuncture, consistent with the practice of placebo-controlled drug trials

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Attitudes to evidence in acupuncture: an interview study. [REVIEW]Kirsten Hansen - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):279-285.
Sham surgery: An ethical analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):157-166.
Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):41-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
28 (#568,255)

6 months
9 (#455,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references