Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):105 – 116 (2006)

Abstract
Deontic reasoning is reasoning about permission and obligation: what one may do and what one must do, respectively. Conceivably, people could reason about deontic matters using a purely formal deontic calculus. I review evidence from a range of psychological experiments suggesting that this is not the case. Instead, I argue that deontic reasoning is supported by a collection of dissociable cognitive adaptations for solving adaptive problems that likely would have confronted ancestral humans.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/13869790500492714
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Modularity of Mind.Robert Cummins & Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):101.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is the Public Incompetent? Compared to Whom? About What?Gerald Gaus - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):291-311.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
13 ( #766,013 of 2,499,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #419,059 of 2,499,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes