Callicott and the Metaphysical Basis of Ecocentric Morality

Environmental Ethics 15 (2):171-180 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the theory of ecocentric morality, the environment and its many ecosystems are entitled to a direct moral standing, and not simply a standing derivative from human interests. J. Baird Callicott has offered two possible metaphysical foundations for ecocentrism that attempt to show that inherent goodness can apply to environmental collections and not just to individual agents. I argue that Callicott’s first theory fails because it relies on a problematic theory of moral sentiments and that his second theory fails because it rests on an unsupported parallel between the breakdown of the subject-object dichotomy suggested by quantum theory and an alleged actualization of morality upon the interaction of environmental collections with consciousness. Finally, I argue that Callicott overrates the need for a metaphysical grounding of inherent value, and that the metaphysical question has little bearing on the normative issue of ecocentrism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ecological Morality and Nonmoral Sentiments.Ernest Partridge - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):149-163.
Callicott and Naess on pluralism.Andrew Light - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):273 – 294.
On Callicott’s Second-Order Principles.Eric B. Horn - 2005 - Environmental Ethics 27 (4):411-428.
Callicott’s “Metaphysics of Morals”.Jim Cheney - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (4):311-325.
Critique of Callicott's biosocial moral theory.John Hadley - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):67-78.
Ecosystem Ecology and Metaphysical Ecology.Karen J. Warren & Jim Cheney - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (2):99-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#389,099)

6 months
6 (#524,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Critique of Callicott's biosocial moral theory.John Hadley - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):67-78.
Hume on Animals and the Rest of Nature.Angela Coventry & Avram Hiller - 2014 - In John Hadley & Elisa Aaltola (eds.), Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy. Rowman and Littlefield International. pp. 165-184..

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references