Logos and Episteme 12 (1):7-28 (2021)

Authors
Claire Field
University of Stirling
Abstract
The Enkratic Principle enjoys something of a protected status as a requirement of rationality. I argue that this status is undeserved, at least in the epistemic domain. Compliance with the principle should not be thought of as a requirement of epistemic rationality, but rather as defeasible indication of epistemic blamelessness. To show this, I present the Puzzle of Inconsistent Requirements, and argue that the best way to solve it is to distinguish two kinds of epistemic evaluation – requirement evaluations and appraisal evaluations. This allows us to solve the puzzle while accommodating traditional motivations for thinking of the Enkratic Principle as a requirement of rationality.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/logos-episteme20211211
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Enkratic Agency.David Horst - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):47-67.
Enkratic Agency.David Horst - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (4).
The Enkratic Requirement.Allen Coates - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):320-333.
Is the Enkratic Principle a Requirement of Rationality?Andrew Reisner - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (4):436-462.
Explaining Enkratic Asymmetries: Knowledge-First Style.Paul Silva - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2907-2930.
Response to Professor Chisholm.V. C. Chappell - 1965 - The Monist 49 (1):36-37.
The Principle of Equivalence.A. Schild - 1962 - The Monist 47 (1):20-39.
The Principle of Equivalence.A. Schild - 1962 - The Monist 47 (1):20-39.
Anti-Intellectualism and the Knowledge-Action Principle. [REVIEW]Ram Neta - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):180–187.
The Principle of Relativity.Paul Carus - 1912 - The Monist 22 (2):188-229.
The First Principle of Social Evolution.I. W. Howerth - 1927 - The Monist 37 (2):183-198.
The Principle of Welfare.Harald Höffding - 1891 - The Monist 1 (4):525-551.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-04

Total views
269 ( #37,177 of 2,462,461 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #11,089 of 2,462,461 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes