Mill's Principle of Utility: A Defense of John Stuart Mill's Notorious Proof

Amsterdam and Atlanta: Brill | Rodopi (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This is a defense of John Stuart Mill’s proof of the principle of utility in the fourth chapter of his Utilitarianism. The proof is notorious as a fallacious attempt by a prominent philosopher, who ought not to have made the elementary mistakes he is supposed to have made. This book shows that he did not. The aim is not to glorify utilitarianism, in a full sweep, as the best normative ethical theory, or even to vindicate, on a more specific level, Mill’s universalistic ethical hedonism as the best form of utilitarianism. The book is concerned only with Mill’s utilitarianism, and primarily with his proof of the principle of utility. The purpose is to show that Mill proceeds intelligibly and systematically in pursuing a well-defined project in the fourth chapter of Utilitarianism, and that he successfully defends what he sets out to establish in his proof of the principle of utility.

Similar books and articles

A Defense of John Stuart Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility.Necip Fikri Alican - 1994 - Dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis
Bentham, Mill and Sidgwick.Ross Harrison - 2002 - In Nicholas Bunnin & E. P. Tsui‐James (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 759–773.
Mill's Proof of Utilitarianism.A. T. Fyfe - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 223–228.
A comment on mill's argument for utilitarianism.Shia Moser - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):308-318.
J. S. Mill's Utilitarianism.Christopher Alan Hoffman - 1994 - Dissertation, Washington University
John Stuart Mill's Concept of Utility.Wendy Donner - 1983 - Dialogue 22 (3):479-494.


Added to PP

1,258 (#9,976)

6 months
355 (#5,593)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Necip Fikri Alican
Washington University in St. Louis (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.
The limits of morality.Shelly Kagan - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
How to derive "ought" from "is".John R. Searle - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58.
The naturalistic fallacy.W. K. Frankena - 1939 - Mind 48 (192):464-477.

View all 106 references / Add more references